Review–Mio Alpha Strapless Heart Rate Monitor

So, I am getting this review out late enough that there is now a Mio Alpha 2, as well as a Mio Fuse, which are all more recent that what I am currently using.  However, I am going to review my Mk 1 Mio Alpha anyway.  Obviously, I cannot say how well it translates to the more recent versions, but take from it what you will.

I have been using the Mio Alpha for more than a year now.  For those that have not read my primer on heart rate monitor watch, the Mio Alpha uses an optical sensor to measure and track heart rate.  This is the same technology that is used in the pulse oximeter, aka, the little pincher contraption that nurses put on your finger to make sure you have enough oxygen in your blood. In addition to your blood oxygenation, however, it can also indicate your heart rate.

The Mio Alpha will not track your oxygen level, however. It is strictly heart rate.  It can track your heart rate in two modes.  First, a “passive” tracking where it displays your heart rate but notifications are off.  The second, “active” mode, you can set a high and low boundary for your “target zone”  and it will alert you if you go above or below these limits.

I find I more often just leave it in passive monitoring, mostly because the beeping when out of zone can get pretty annoying.  I have been at this long enough to recognize the feeling of when I need to check what my HR is doing.  You can also press a button to toggle between the time, heart rate, and a stopwatch if you prefer not to leave your HR visible for all to see.

In terms of HR accuracy, I have found that the Mio Alpha is usually accurate . . . eventually.  But sometimes it takes a while to get there.  Too much wrist motion seems to throw it off; not so much the swinging of the arms motion (like jogging) but more the wrist motion of folding clothes, typing, washing dishes, etc.  It is usually temporary, and rights itself once I stop, but it is pretty common.  I have caught some heart rates on it that I can physically count and know that the watch is off; I usually attribute these to too much wrist motion.

Also, unlike chest strap based HR watches, it is unlikely to catch the rapid spikes in Heart Rate (HR).   I know I can get rapid and dramatic rises in HR when I change positions, move my arms around too much, or sometimes even breathe deeply.  They generally don’t last long (generally under 30 seconds, many times under 10).  These, however, have proven to be beyond what the watch can catch.  If you are trying to catch every little (or big) up and down of your HR, the Mio Alpha is not going to do for you.  The watch takes several seconds to adjust to ups and downs in HR, and sometimes the spike is over before it can adjust.

Cold seems to affect the performance as well, though this is likely more me than the watch.  I know many people with dysautonomia also have Reynauds, or at the very least have some extreme blood vessel constriction/dilation in the hands.  But when outside in the snow, it did have more trouble keeping track of my HR.

Finally, I noticed one last issue with the watch, and it would probably not be a problem for most people.  However, I have the flavor of dysautonomia that results in wild swings in blood pressure, both systolic and diastolic.  This can result in pretty crazy pulse pressures, ranging from 60+ to 11.  While, in my experience, these odd pulse pressures are pretty transient, they really screw with the watch.  Not really surprising, considering how the watch works.  Typically, I find when my pulse pressure is low (indicated by a weakly detectable pulse) the watch thinks I have a really low heart rate (like 40-50’s) when I can clearly feel that it is higher than that.  While I know that the HR is inaccurate at times like this, it is helpful in that it indicates (albeit indirectly) that my blood pressure is struggling to maintain balance, and it might be time to find a seat.

Now that I have expounded of the flaws of the watch.  Let me tell you what i like.  I LOVE not having to wear a chest strap. LOVE, LOVE, LOVE.  I can wear the watch all day.  It can still go all day on one charge, even on active monitoring, after a year of use.  No annoying rashes from chest straps, or having to take the chest strap on and off as needed (since it kept giving me a rash with all day use).  When it comes down to it, it is just plain easier for me to use.  The trade-off is that I know it misses some HR spikes and drops.  In the beginning, I wanted to know what my HR was doing each and every beat.  However, 4 years later, that is not so important to me anymore.  I mainly need to know if my HR is going high or low, and if it is staying there.  I now know that a 10 second spike up to 160 bpm is not really going to cause a problem.  However, if I spend a couple of minutes up in the 160 range, I know I am at risk of syncope or pre-syncope.  Thus, having the watch alert me to prolonged high HR is my early warning, so to speak.  Secondly, it offers a certain piece of mind, especially when out and about.  If I feel that familiar wave of light-headedness, I can check the watch and see the my HR is not in a danger zone, yet, and I just need to stop for a moment and recover.  Could it be a bit of a crutch for me, . . . probably.  But I figure if it helps me out the door, there are worse bad habits to have.

I am not going to lie, the Mio Alpha is not the prettiest watch around–though most HR watches tend not to be.  Even with the new purple color, it is still a pretty masculine looking watch.  Just comes with the territory, unfortunately.  Not exactly dainty, either.  It also lacks a backlight for checking the watch in low-light situations, a pretty annoying feature actually.  But I believe the Mio Alpha 2 has remedied that problem, as well as added step tracking, calories, etc. that many of the activity trackers on the market now have.

It also has the ability to sync up to your smart phone to track heart rate via bluetooth+.  I do not have a phone capable of doing this, so I am not able to keep and record my HR patterns.  To me, this was not a big deal as I was mainly only interested in real-time heart rates.  However, if this is important to you, make sure you have a compatible device.

Finally, the customer service I received from Mio was pretty good as well.  The charger for first watch I  bought had an issue and frequently refused to actually charge the watch.  After contacting them, they asked me to send the charger and watch back, after which they would send out a new one.  I had to pay return shipping (which was annoying) but nothing for the new watch.  Later, just before the one year anniversary of me getting the watch, I had a side button break.  Once again, Mio completely replaced the watch with the only requirement that I send back the defective one (at my expense).  Do I think they should have paid the return shipping . . . yes.  But in this day and age, customer service has become a rare commodity, so I will take it.

One final note.  As far as I know, the Mio Alpha can only be charged via a computer USB port.  I am on the computer all the time, so it is very easy to plug it in and charge.  However, if you rarely use or don’t have a computer, this could present a challenge.

Mio Alpha $149, available at Mioglobal.com and various other retailers

 

Heart Rate Monitor Watches – A Primer

One question I see asked about time and time again on my dysautonomia chat groups is . . . What about heart rate monitor watches?  For the uninitiated, some dsyautonomiacs wear heart rate monitors to let them know when their heart rate is getting too high, or too low, or just doing funky stuff.  In the mainstream market, they are intended to assist with hitting targets during training and work-outs.  We have kind of hijacked them for our purposes.

Their use can be somewhat divisive in the dysautonomia community—some claim they can make a person paranoid, always watching your wrist instead of focusing on how you feel.  Others feel like they are a lifesaver.  I am pretty much in the camp of “do whatever you got to do”.  Some will probably obsess, others not so much.  Some may use it as a crutch, but if it is a crutch that allows you to get out of the house, maybe there is some merit.   Only you can make that call; I am not going to get on you either way—we are all just trying to get through the day.  I personally use them, and find them helpful.  So, like many of my other reviews, I want to share my experience.

But before I get into specifics, I want to give you a little background—a primer, so to speak.  As far as I can tell (seems like technology is always changing), there are 3 types of Heart Rate Monitor Watches available right now, as least in the US.

Type 1-Active Watch-Only

The most basic, and usually cheapest, is a watch-only device.  In order to view your heart rate, you must take a finger and place it on a special spot on the watch for a few seconds, and the watch will read your pulse.  You can think of it as a digital upgrade to the “put your fingers on your neck” trick.  This type of watch will only offer active monitoring—it will not monitor your heart rate unless your finger is on that specific spot. It cannot alert you to a high heart rate unless you think to check it.  There are many different makers of this type of heart rate watch, and prices can vary.  However, most heart rate watches under $40 will fall into this category.

Bowflex EZ Pro

Type 2 – Passive Watch/Chest Strap Combo

The second type of heart monitor watch can offer continuous monitoring.  This set up will include a watch as well as a chest strap of some kind.  There are many different makers of both watches and chest straps, some intercomparable, some not.  Some will also sync up to apps you can run on your phone or iPod.  You will have to do your research to find out which ones do and don’t—too numerous to list here.  One must wear the chest strap, which usually includes a removable monitor,  that then communicates your heart rate to the appropriately synced watch.  This type of set up allows for passive monitoring, aka you do not need to do anything other than get it set up for it to monitor your heart rate.  Several types also have a function for setting a target heart rate zone, so the watch will alert you if you go above or below this zone.

Polar FT4

The only limitations on how often or long you wear this type of heart rate monitor watch are the batteries and your tolerance of wear the chest strap.  Some brands suggest wetting the chest strap for a better connection, which may irritate sensitive skin.  And as the chest strap needs to be flush against the chest wall, some may not like the feeling of tightness around the chest.  Many in this category offer other features as well, such as tracking calories, workout timer, etc. as these are mostly targeted towards the working out crowd and not the crazy high heart rate for no reason at all crowd.  Prices on this type of monitor can vary greatly, depending on the extra bells and whistles you want.  Plenty of more basic models can be found under $100, and occasionally under $50.  Higher end models can run a couple of hundred dollars and can include GPS, syncing to your computer/phone, and keeping your heart-rate records stored for future access.

Type 3 – Passive Watch-Only

The third is a relatively new addition to the market.  These are watch-only models that allow passive monitoring.  Despite being new, they use a rather old technology—the good old pulse oximeter.  Yes, that thingy the doc puts on the end of your finger that indicates your pulse and percent oxygen saturation.  Pretty much the exact same thing, but moved on to the wrist—and it only does pulse, not oxygen saturation (probably could if they programed it to, though).   As far as I can tell these are the only watches on the market can do passive monitoring without a chest strap.  And they tend to be pricey, average about $200.  I am only aware of 2 watches that fall into this category, at least as the moment–the Mio Alpha and the Basis B1.  It is unclear if more manufacturers will start making this type of watch or not.

Mio Alpha

Activity Trackers

A somewhat new category that is tangentially related is the activity tracker.  Activity trackers are generally just fancy pedometers.  Depending on the model, they may be able to track sleep, stairs climbed, or even calories if you use synced phone apps.  Their accuracy is somewhat debatable at the moment, and most do not track heart rate.  However, the Basis B1 (which is like a cross between the watch-only passive heart rate monitor and an activity tracker) does both as well as the Polar activity tracker that can sink up with a polar chest strap to track heart rate.  Which pretty much makes it exactly like the chest strap-watch combo except as a bracelet instead of a watch—and extra bells and whistles.

Polar Loop

Hopefully you now have an idea about the different types of Heart Rate Monitor watches available.  Now that you have the basics, be on the lookout in the next few weeks for reviews on a couple of different Heart Rate Monitor watches.

If I have missed a type or category, please feel free to let me know in the comments.